Does anyone (or everyone?) use Bridge with LR and PS? I've been trying to find what it does or does better than LR and can't really find anything. Just curious if I'm missing something by not using it?
WELCOME TO THE MONKEY LOUNGE!
Troll-free zone | 1500px max for photos | Play nice!
Hi Roland, I use Bridge instead of using Lightroom. Bridge is part of the Photoshop suite which includes Bridge, Adobe Camera Raw, and Photoshop. Bridge is a basic program for sorting/cataloging files. It isn't really designed to work with Lightroom; rather, Lightroom combines (and enhances) the cataloging and image editing functions of Bridge and Adobe Camera Raw. I personally find Lightroom annoying, so I don't use it. Bridge isn't very good for advanced cataloging and keywording, Lightroom is preferred for that sort of thing. Adobe Camera Raw offers essentially the same editing capabilities as Lightroom. My workflow is to sort and select files in Bridge, edit the raw files in Adobe Camera Raw, and then I output the files to Photoshop for any final editing.
Thanks, Ian. Appreciate the insights.
Bridge and Lightroom were written by the same person, Jeff Schewe. The interfaces are a bit different, but perform the same basic tasks. Bridge is a flat file database and Lightroom is a relational database so it is a bit faster. Bridge reads all file formats; Lightroom only reads photo files. I generate Illustrator, InDesign, Acrobat and other format files which I cannot view in Lightroom, but I can in Bridge. I, like Ian, use Bridge because it is more versatile. I find Lightroom's workflow—compelling you to use a copy of your file when exporting to Photoshop and then making a new file when returning to Lightroom—to be cumbersome and a space hog. Some photographers only use Lightroom, relying on presets to process their images. I have used Photoshop since version 2 and it is infinitely more capable at processing images with infinitely more control. I use Photoshop for the same reason I shoot RAW—I don't want someone else, who has never seen my image, making decisions about how it is supposed to look.
Thanks. I use LR but rarely use presets. Sounds like I need to give Bridge a try.
Hi Roland, I think its really a case of one or the other. The reason being is Lightroom uses a catalogue (database) to store information (not the file). changing locations of files or modifying them without the call from lightroom to the editing program can cause issues with he catalogue becoming out of sync. I have been a LR user since version 2 so I am a strong advocate for the use of it as a Digital Asset manager, as such I use Bridge very rarely and only to browse directories. Any files that are edited are imported in to LR and then processed and edited. Bob Faucher I think you are incorrect if you edit a RAW file Photoshop will save it as a Tiff or PSD so like LR, it will make a copy of your work file. Photoshop does not save RAW or DNG files. The beauty of LR is that I can tweak the PSD output without modifying the Photoshop file without going back to PS. I know a lot of people use bridge but my belief is that this is an artifact of when LR and PS where seperate programs and Bridge was free with PS. Now that they are all part of a package I feel bridge is antiquated and very limited